Social Psychology

br OF EYEWITNESS , LAWYERS , AND JURIESOf all of the evidentiary possibilities a runnel lawyer may face , the eye witness believably carries the greatest cachet Against a criminal defendant , the softw atomic number 18 documentation of an witness greatly increases the likelihood that a defendant furnish be convicted . One study showed that without an eyewitness , there was all an 18 percent chance of conviction with an eyewitness , this jumped to 77 percent . Juries believe that eyewitnesses are accurate and observant , and that they go for their memories of crimes without distortion . Scientific studies contract found that of these are authorized . Often , eyewitnesses are non accurate . The crime victim is oft in a very poor psychic land to observe accurately . The human capacity to distinguish and prev ent data accurately is vastly everyplace-rated . Most good helping hand are not aware of how much memories change oer time . Juries tend to dismiss situationors that might show the inaccuracy of eyewitness testimony , while assigning great importance to factors , such(prenominal) as the confidence with which a witness testifies or the arrange of enlarge he imp humanistic discipline , that are for the almost part irrelevant to the really accuracy of the testimony ( 93Psychology and Law - eyewitness Accuracy 94 n .dMany people go to curious lengths to bar instrument panel duty . One of the most common is to asseverate that their business duties do not allow them to serve on gore duties . some states have adopted rules restricting the excuses a potential juryman plunder use to avoid jury duty . States instanter use driver 92s license records rather than select roles to provide a more representative cross-section of the community touch on in jury selection .
notwithstanding this , there is up to now a certain accuracy to the adage that a xii person jury consists of quintuple men drawing mixer security and seven women whose most daunting intellectual repugn in the typical workweek is reading the Soap opera Digest ( 93A Primer on Jury Advocacy 94 2003Nevertheless , studies have shown that much of the criticism of juries is not borne out in fact . Recent studies have shown that the jury process does work sooner well , involving true Of witness , Lawyers and Juries Page deliberations in cases in which the jurors collectively feel that they are peers with one another , so that they share comparable levels of govern mental and social sophistication (Gastil , Burkhalter coloured , n .d )While jurors work disenfranchised to discern the truth , trial lawyers often seem objective on muddling everything . A good trial lawyer is apt in the arts of persuasion . Lawyers study techniques of persuasion , aid seminars and training programs , hiring coaches , and operative to refine their skills ( See , e .g , 93Persuasion 94 2007 93Using Storytelling techniques 94 2007 93Ulitmate audition Tehcniques 94 2007 93A Primer on Jury Advocacy 94 2003 ) However , disposed(p) that the lawyer 92s credit line is the zealous representation of the lymph node this does not always suppose that the truth is being served . It can mean that the jury testament hear some wonderfully entertaining presentations , but it does not mean that the focus...If you want to pop off a full essay, battle array it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you wa nt to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper