1 . The five models of normative ethical theories discussed include the pursuit from (Quinn , 2009 , Post , 2004 . In parenthesis , I have listed the confession or standard for an action (X ) under the hypothesisdivine command guessing (God said do Xact utilitarianism (X will increase happinessrule utilitarianism (performing acts like X routinely in these circumstances would be expected to affect the general happinesssocial contract possibility (X will not better the rights of myself or othersKantianism (X does not treat people as a means to an end , and even if society adjusted to everyone choosing X in this circumstance , X would remain a operable choice2 . The important difference between utilizing social contract scheme and Kantianism for ethical decision-making is that social-contract opening is concerned with ri ghts , while Kantianism is concerned with debt puppet and making sure the decision remains viable for others to tinkers dam in the upcoming .

In social contract theory , decision-making involves determining what set of rights everyone can have without interfering with genuine rights of greater importance . Thereafter we just have to fill whether a proposed action would violate any of the existing rights . The bickering is considering ahead of time what rights everyone can have that will not conflict with one another and anticipating any exceptions In Kantianism , we debate out the idea of rights and c onsider whether our performing the action wo! uld polish that potential drop decision off to others in the future . In contemporary language , we might say that Kantianism is sustainable decision-making ReferencesPOST...If you want to relieve oneself a full essay, order it on our website:
OrderCustomPaper.comIf you want to get a full essay, visit our page:
write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment